|
by Ray Littaua
|
|
Monday, 25 May 2009 |
|
In the last couple of months, we have seen the stock market rise,
together with the increase in prices of commodities (including oil).
Meantime, the forecast is that the US dollar, the world’s reserve
currency, will go on a downward trend in light of a still faltering US
economy, increasing unemployment, and the surge in the US budget
deficit due to the US$800B allocation for TARP (Troubled Asset Reform
Program).
...So the signs are not as encouraging as the stock market would like us
to believe. But these stock market investors still hope that everything
will be fine soon. They interpret events and financial reports here
and there as “green shoots.” I say brown for now.
Investor confidence, as you see, is tied up to the stock market, and as
they say, reflects the economy of the country. Caveat emptor: This
incremental rise in prices is not tied to fundamentals. It is going to
be the same traditional adage: P/E [price-to-earnings] ratios, my
friend, will be the rule from now on. We wait till the market gets its
bull market run, maybe in a couple of years. Then we’ll be back to the
same good old days of venture capitalists and future earnings
speculation—and a lot of moolah to make everybody smile once again…
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
by Luis F. Dumlao
|
|
Monday, 16 March 2009 |
|
On 23 October 2008, in his testimony to the United States House of
Representatives Oversight Committee, Alan Greenspan called the banking
and housing chaos a “once-in-a-century credit tsunami.” Interestingly
and figuratively speaking, a once-in-a-century tsunami was happening in
the population of those aged 60 to 65. The reason had to do with three
particular birth spurts in the US. The first and second batches were
born in 1942 and 1943 or during pre-deployment to Europe and Asia .(The
invasion of Normandy was June 1944, and Leyte Day was October 1944.)
The third was the first born “baby boomers” in 1947 immediately after
World War II. (V-day in Europe was May 1945 and V-day in Japan was
August 1945.)
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
by Filomeno S. Sta. Ana III
|
|
Monday, 09 March 2009 |
Leaders of developed and developing countries all recognize the need for collective action to tame the worldwide recession.
But collective action is easier said than done. Protectionism is tempting as jobs and incomes at home are vanishing.
Topnotch economists, including Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke and Barry Eichengreen (University of California, Berkeley), say that mercantilist policies during times of world recession did work. See for example Bernanke’s Essays on the Great Depression (2000) and Eichengreen’s Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919-1939 (1992).
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
by Business World
|
|
Tuesday, 03 March 2009 |
MEASURES TAKEN by the Philippines to keep the economy afloat amid the
global slowdown — more public spending and wider access to credit — are
correct but policy makers should particularly devote resources to
achieving economic development in the medium to long term, a United
Nations (UN) official said.
Jomo Kwame Sundaram, UN assistant secretary-general for economic
development, said developing countries such as the Philippines should
increase investments toward the development of industries.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
by Action for Economic Reforms
|
|
Tuesday, 03 March 2009 |
|
Developing countries will “bear the brunt of the financial crisis
originating in the US and other developed countries.” All
economies will in fact be affected by the crisis, albeit differently, contrary
to the view that emerging markets are “decoupled” from the US economy.
United Nations Assistant Secretary-General for Economic Development
Jomo K. Sundaram gave this assessment in a public lecture on the
Global Financial Crisis and Asia held at the Ateneo de Manila
University on February 23, 2009. It is interesting to note that the UN was the only multilateral
institution that warned of an impending financial crisis as early as
2006.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
by Filomeno S. Sta. Ana III
|
|
Monday, 02 March 2009 |
Let’s face it: The Barack Obama stimulus plan by itself will not lift
the US from the recession in the quickest and most decisive manner.
Some quarters—Paul Krugman, for example—have doubts about the
effectiveness of the stimulus plan. Krugman criticizes the stimulus
plan for lacking boldness as well as for being incomplete and
inadequate.
But let us assume that the Obama administration will take heed of
Krugman’s advice and adopt his more aggressive proposals. Will that
lead to the definitive stimulus?
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
|